The Real Cost of Your Next Hire (It's Not the Salary)

You've done the math. The offer letter says $85,000. Your model says you can afford $85,000. Six months in, the number leaving your account looks nothing like that.

Rob Owen
The Real Cost of Your Next Hire (It's Not the Salary)

You've done the math. The offer letter says $85,000. Your model says you can afford $85,000. Six months in, the number leaving your account every month looks nothing like that, and you're left staring at the gap wondering where it came from.

Here's what happened: the salary was never the real number. It's the headline. Everything else is the fine print, and the fine print is where the actual cost lives.

I've watched this exact moment happen at four different companies, from the inside, as the person who had to explain the gap to whoever signed the offer letter. It's never a surprise to the finance team. It's always a surprise to everyone else.

The number under the number

Start with payroll tax. The employer share of FICA is 7.65% of wages — split between Social Security and Medicare — and that's before your state's unemployment insurance shows up (yes, even if this is your very first W-2 hire and you're still an LLC of one). Add health insurance, averaging north of $7,700 a year for a single employee, more than triple that for a family plan. Add retirement matching. Add workers' comp. Add the laptop, the software seats, and the job posting nobody remembers to line-item.

By the time you're done, you're not looking at 1.0x the salary. You're looking at 1.25x. Often 1.4x. Sometimes higher. On a $60,000 role, that's the difference between an $83,000 year and an $83,000 illusion.

Real talk: the invisible costs are worse than the visible ones

The line items above are annoying, but at least they show up on a spreadsheet somewhere. What actually blows a hiring budget is the stuff nobody puts a number on: the weeks of ramp time before the new hire produces anything close to what they're costing you, the hours your best people spend training instead of building, the onboarding that always runs longer than the calendar promised.

None of that shows up in the offer letter. All of it shows up in your runway.

It's payroll tax. It's benefits. It's the three months before they're worth what you're paying them.

The offer letter tells you what the hire costs on paper. Your bank account tells you what it actually costs. Those are two different documents, and only one of them is honest.

What operators who've been burned actually do

You don't budget for a hire. You budget for a hire, plus that hire's tax bill, plus that hire's benefits, plus the slower version of your team while everyone gets them up to speed.

Every finance function I've ever worked alongside runs that fully-loaded number before the offer goes out, not after the first paycheck clears — not the base salary, the real one, modeled against actual runway instead of the optimistic version of it.

Doing that math by hand, every single time you're tempted to hire, is exactly the kind of task that gets skipped when you're also running sales and product and everything else in between. That's the whole reason we built MyRunwayHealth to model headcount cost against your real cash position instead of your gut feeling, so the fully-loaded number shows up before the offer does, not after it.

Final Thoughts

The salary was never the number. The tax is part of the number. The benefits are part of the number. The ramp time is part of the number.

And if you model all four before you hire instead of after, you're not being conservative. You're being accurate.

Labor Day always kicks off a wave of "we should hire before Q4" conversations. Walk into that one with your eyes open instead of your fingers crossed.

Field notes from the cap table

Practical posts on runway, burn, and the boring-but-critical math of bootstrapping. Sent occasionally — never spammy.

Email delivery via Substack. Unsubscribe any time.